# Lawyer or legal counsel? How to choose

> Compare when you need a lawyer and when a legal counsel is enough, with a decision table, the costs, and what a legal counsel can and cannot do for you.

## The short answer

A lawyer (advocaat) has the right to litigate and may conduct proceedings at the district court, while a legal counsel (jurist) advises, drafts contracts and may represent you at the subdistrict court. As a rule of thumb a legal counsel is enough for advice, contracts and negotiation, and you need a lawyer for proceedings at the district court, on appeal or in cassation.

## Key takeaways

- Only a lawyer may litigate at the district court, the court of appeal and the Supreme Court
- At the subdistrict court a legal counsel may represent you
- For advice and contracts a legal counsel is often enough and cheaper

## What is the difference between a lawyer and a legal counsel?

Both are legally trained, but their powers differ. A legal counsel (jurist) has
completed a university law degree and may advise, draft contracts and negotiate. A
lawyer (advocaat) has additionally completed a professional training of about two
years, is sworn in, falls under disciplinary law, and has the right to litigate. In
the Netherlands "advocaat" is a protected title, "jurist" is not.

That difference in training and oversight also explains the price difference. To
see what those rates look like, read
[what a lawyer really costs](https://iusmatch.com/en/resources/what-does-a-lawyer-cost).

## When do you really need a lawyer?

The heart of it is the right to litigate. Under
[the rules on legal representation (art. 79 Rv)](https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001827),
you may appear in person at the subdistrict court, but in all other civil cases at
the district court only through a lawyer. Civil appeals at the court of appeal and
cassation at the Supreme Court are reserved for a lawyer as well.

Which matters belong at the subdistrict court is set out in art. 93 Rv: money
claims up to 25,000 euro, plus employment, tenancy, hire-purchase, agency and
consumer-sale matters regardless of the amount. A consumer-credit case goes to the
subdistrict court if the credit sum is no higher than 40,000 euro. In criminal
cases you are usually assisted by a lawyer; that falls under a separate procedural
law and is outside the scope here.

## When is a legal counsel enough (and cheaper)?

For much of an entrepreneur's legal work no lawyer is needed. A legal counsel can
advise, draft or review contracts and general terms, negotiate, and run the
correspondence before any proceedings. And at the subdistrict court a legal counsel
may act as an authorised representative. For a contract review, for example, a legal
counsel is almost always the logical choice; see
[how a contract review works](https://iusmatch.com/en/resources/contract-review).

Below is a decision table that summarises the line.

| Type of matter | Lawyer required? | Who may act |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Money claim up to 25,000 euro (subdistrict) | No | In person or a representative, such as a legal counsel |
| Employment, tenancy, hire-purchase or consumer-sale matter | No | In person or a representative, such as a legal counsel |
| Consumer credit up to 40,000 euro | No | In person or a representative, such as a legal counsel |
| Civil claim above 25,000 euro (district court) | Yes | Lawyer only |
| Appeal at the court of appeal | Yes | Lawyer only |
| Cassation at the Supreme Court | Yes | Lawyer only |

## What does the difference cost?

A lawyer is more expensive than a legal counsel on average, mainly because of the
heavier training, the oversight and the mandatory insurance. For advice and
contracts you often pay that premium without needing the right to litigate. The
concrete ranges and averages are in the overview on
[what a lawyer really costs](https://iusmatch.com/en/resources/what-does-a-lawyer-cost). The rule of
thumb: choose on what the matter requires, not on the title alone.

## How do you choose between a lawyer and a legal counsel?

Start with whether the matter has to go to court, and if so, to which one. If your
case goes to the district court outside the subdistrict track, or higher up, you
need a lawyer. If it stays with advice, a contract, a negotiation or a subdistrict
matter, a legal counsel is often faster and cheaper.

Weigh the timeline and the risk too, not just the price. Bringing in a lawyer for
proceedings takes more preparation and lead time than a legal counsel who advises you
or drafts a letter. For a quick, well-defined question you are usually done sooner
with a legal counsel, while for a heavier case you want exactly the experience and
the right to litigate that a lawyer brings. A good choice starts with an honest read
of what the matter really needs, and only then with the rate.

Still unsure? On iusmatch you describe your situation and it is structured, so the
right type of legal professional is matched on the legal field and the complexity.
See [how iusmatch works for clients](https://iusmatch.com/en/for-clients) and see up front who will
take your case and at what price.

## Frequently asked questions

**Can a legal counsel go to court?**

At the subdistrict court yes, as an authorised representative. For other civil cases at the district court, on appeal and in cassation, litigating is reserved for a lawyer.

**Is a lawyer always more expensive?**

On average yes, but not in every case. For well-defined advice or a contract a legal counsel is often cheaper and equally suitable.

**What is an in-house counsel?**

A legal professional employed by an organisation to handle its own legal matters. An in-house counsel is not a lawyer and has no right to litigate.

---

## About iusmatch

iusmatch is a legal marketplace that connects individuals and businesses anonymously with vetted lawyers and counsel for cross-border matters. You see the scope and price up front, and your identity is only shared after you accept a proposal.

Canonical URL: https://iusmatch.com/en/resources/lawyer-or-legal-counsel